MeshMobile (as in ‘BatMobile’!)

Ages ago when Live Mesh was first announced I watched Ori Amiga’s demo on Channel 9 that showed not just the File sharing aspects of Mesh, but how it could be used for applications.  It really impressed me and being a bit of a petrolhead one of the first apps I thought about was something for cars.  Syncing Music of course, but also SatNav info or settings and diagnostics.

Good news is, I’m not mad and Ori had the same idea!  Channel 9 have just posted up a video of a ‘MeshMobile’ solution they’ve been building.  Take a look for yourself, but I think it’s a great idea.  It’ll be interesting to see whether anyone picks this up and starts building products.  With small, low cost, Atom based computers now commonplace it shouldn’t be too hard – as Ori has proved!

Ori Amiga: Mesh Mobile

Macs in the Mesh

After a couple of false starts the Mesh team have just released the Community Tech Preview of the Mesh client.

I’ve just installed it on my Macbook here and at all works very well indeed.  Once signed in you can add and sync your Meshed folders easily and get to all the same docs and files.  Good stuff!

The only thing that doesn’t seem to work (though I’ve not tried to hard I have to admit) is the remote control functionality – controlling other device from the mac at least.  Still, that’s not too important and it’ll be so handy to have all my Meshed folders available on my Mac.

To get the client head over to the Mesh site on your Mac and follow the usual process for adding a device.  It might be worth hurrying though, I beleive that the Mac CTP has a limited number of places for now.

Engineering Windows 7

I’ve just read through the latest posting over on the Engineering Windows 7 blog, this time a follow up post on Desktop Search.  Reading though the posts on there I keep thinking about just how good blogs can be when used properly.

In that blog the product team are able to talk about not only the product itself, but also the ‘why’ aspects of the design decisions they’re making.   I’m not sure that’s ever been visible before outside the usual marketing pitches.  For me it’s fascinating reading – but then I am a bit geeky.

I’ve been trying hard to increase the visibility and transparency of the design decisions made during work here.  It’s not always obvious to the customer or end users, and making the reasoning behind your decisions available should make for more open discussions and hopefully a better product and happier customers.  I think there’s a lot to be learnt from MS and Windows 7 teams approach.

Google Androids breaking Windows

Since T-Mobile launched the first Google Android based phone a few weeks ago I’ve read a few good pieces about the both the phone itself and the overall platform.  I find it interesting that pretty much all the articles and blogs compare Android directly with the iPhone.  From what I’ve seen it’s more an alternative to Microsoft’s Windows Mobile. 

I’m sure some of this is due to the current iPhone and Apple buzz, but I don’t think the WM comparison is something we can ignore.  For one thing Android is a platform rather than a ‘product’.  Where as the iPhone is a complete product – hardware, OS, applications and services, Android is very similar to Windows Mobile in that its a platform you can adopt for your hardware or apps. 

It strikes me that Android is a lot like Chome in that I imagine its seen as a vehicle for the delivery of Googles cloud services.  Although I don’t think Google have really chased the Enterprise market in the past they seem to be building up this side of their business, putting in place the building blocks they will need to move in and squash MS.  There’s a lot of money to be made in the enterprise email and office apps market and Google seem to be chasing that cash with a bit more vigor these days.

Googles enterprise email offerings are very competitive.  On price alone they are hard to ignore.  You loose some of the functionality you get with something like Exchange and Outlook, but especially in todays market, it does put you in a place where you start wondering about whether the functionality is worth the extra cost. 

One gap in the email offering seems to be mobile services.  Services like Blackberry and WM push mail are ubiquitous in business today and will be important for business adoption.  Sure there’s a mobile GoogleMail site, and a client for Blackberry but having their own platform out there that can do push mail, run the core Google apps and provide a platform for third party apps is a very attractive piece of the overall solution.

The fact that few articles are comparing Andoid to WM really surprises me.  And if I was a WM product manager I’d be both happy and worried about that.  Happy because the market seems to be pitching Android against Apple.  Worried because no one is talking about my product.

Edit:  I just spotted a great review of the T-Mobile G1 and Android over on Engadget that gives a good description of Androids integration with the Google cloud.

Silverlight 2.0 Released

Today MS have released Silverlight 2.0 out of beta.  Great news for me as I can now get it rolled out at work and get people trying out things like PhotoSynth and DeepZoom (we can’t really deploy betas!).  I’m really looking forward to seeing how people might use them. 

The installation is here and is available for PC and Mac and supports IE, Firefox and Google Chrome. 

An interesting note from the release material is that it seems like Apple are blocking a release for iPhone… I guess it gets in the way of their own plans?  What with Silverlight on its way to Windows Mobile and Nokia, and WM Mesh clients on their way too, I’m going to feel a little left out with my iPhone.

Given MS’s current marketing campaign if I were them I’d be tempted to build iPhone compatible clients anyway.  Then I’d show them working as much as possible and let Apple publicly deny them to users…