New Donington F1 Circuit

Last year good ol’ Bernie announced that the British Grand Prix would be moving from its home at Silverstone to Donington.

Donington is a great circuit, and hosted one of the most exciting first laps I’ve ever seen back in 1993 (check it out below).  To handle a modern GP however it was always going to need a heap of development.

Over on the BBC News site today they’ve got a video from a simulation of the new track layout.  It’s looking pretty good so far, and from what I hear work is already starting on the changes.

Here’s that first lap I mentioned…

Ayrton Senna’s first lap of Doningtion at the 1993 European GP

 

Facebook Privacy Settings

After a brief conversation about online privacy at work on Friday, I’d been meaning to look into the various privacy settings available to Facebook users. 

After a bit of Googling I found this post by Nick O’Neill.  It’s a pretty good overview so I though I’d pass it on.  Whilst ‘locking down’ your profile does make sense, I do wonder how much of the value social networking has would vanish if everyone did it. 

Anyways, if you use Facebook it’s worth a read:

http://www.allfacebook.com/2009/02/facebook-privacy/

Let it snow… Twitter becomes a weather service

I’m a bit of a Twitter fan.  Even I didn’t think I’d ever look at twitter for a weather report though.

As those of us in the UK will know, there’s some pretty cold weather here at the moment with snow being predicted over the next few days.  This afternoon I started seeing a few people I know from Seloc tweeting about snow where they were.  After a while I started seeing people using a twitter hashtag of #uksnow. Great idea, by reading all the tweets with that hash I could read where it was snowing the most.  This data was initially collected via Hashtags.org but we found a better solution in the hashtag tracker from BrandMentions – this also covers Instagram as well as Twitter.

It’s now 11pm and I’m watching CSI and thinking about going to bed. Seeing as I have a 50 mile commute in the morning I thought I’d logon and see how the weather is looking.  In the space of a few hours the #uksnow tweets have organised themselves into a format of post code plus heaviness of snow out of 10 – so something like ‘#uksnow KT22 5/10’

With the info being in a known format, some enterprising chap has mashed-up the tweets with google maps so you can now see where the snow is falling.  All based on the real-time info posted on twitter.  Its impressive stuff – especially seeing how it evolved over a few hours!  A good example of how crowdsourcing can work for a common cause.  If you can get the information into a known and structured data set it can be used in so many different ways.

#uksnow weather mashup

Check it out:  http://uksnow.benmarsh.co.uk/ (original link http://www.benmarsh.co.uk/snow/)

Update… some more info on how it all came together courtesy of Paul Clarke: http://honestlyreal.wordpress.com/2009/02/01/a-flurry-of-uksnow/

Update 2:  there’s now an updated page at http://uksnow.benmarsh.co.uk/

Rules of Engagement for Social Media

I spotted this a few weeks ago but forgot to post about it – fortunately a conversation at work today reminded me!

The rise of social media and its use in both our social and professional lives has caused some organisations a headache over the past few years.  Many have found it difficult to know how to react to this new form of media.  Should they allow its use at work?  Should they block it?  What if someone talks about the company or it work online?  To be fair, they’re not always easy questions to answer.

More enlightened companies will embrace this part of the internet – after all it’s not going to just disappear – and put in place guidelines or rules to help protect the company and it’s employees. 

There are a few good examples of these sorts of policy around, one of the best can be found over at Edelman.  A few weeks ago however I stumbled across this from the US Air Force

air_force_web_posting_response_assessment 

Personally I think this is a good, pragmatic approach to take.  It recognises the various characters you’ll find online and provides some sensible guidance for how to evaluate the conversation and whether to respond.

Having read a bit further it turns out that the USAF has some pretty lofty ambitions for its online presence, in effect preparing every airman to be an online communicator.  Someone who can support and promote the USAF online.  I think you’d be hard pressed to find many other organisations which actively encourage their employees to promote the company ‘brand’ online.  It’s a refreshing approach.

Links:
USAF on Twitter
Air Force Live blog
YouTube Channel
Podcasts

Hat tip to David Meerman Scott who has some good info on the subject (I can’t’ remember who’s tweet pointed me at his site though – sorry!)

Learning how to write

I don’t know about you but I take writing for granted.  I learnt to do it at school and bar a bit of guidance when I was at uni I’ve never really thought about techniques for writing properly.  So when I was offered a place on a ‘business writing’ workshop I wasn’t too sure what to expect.

Now, having spent the day with a guy who’s job is technical writing I’m almost embarrassed about how little I know – and how much there is to learn.  For example, I had no idea there was a way of measuring the readability of text.  It had never occurred to me that there might be a way of scoring how easy a document is to read.

There are a few different readability measures out there, but the one I learned about today was based on the Gunning-Fog Index (its not quite the same).  In effect it works out a score from the number of words, sentences and complex words.

Index = (Total Words / Sentences) + 100(Complex Words / Total Words)

  Total Words     = The total number of words
  Sentences       = The total number of sentences
  Complex Words   = The number of words with three syllables
                    or more, excluding those ending with 'ed'
                    and 'ing' and counting pro-nouns only
                    once.

This formula gives you a score that you can assess your writing with and compare with other text.  A good measure would be to compare text with that of a news paper for example.

Another new discovery for me today (and I feel a bit stupid about this one) is that newspapers have a specific, and consistent, level of readability.  This level is matched to their subject matter and reader demographic.  Here in the UK, the Financial Times has an index of ~41 (as measured with this method) and the low end tabloids drop to something like 22.  The Guardian has an index of ~34, as does the Independent.

As the formula is based on two factors – sentence length and percentage of complex words – texts with the same index scores could still be very different to read.  For example anyone who has read the Guardian and the Independent will know they’re very different papers.

Average Sentence Length % of Complex Words Readability Index
18 16 34
20 14 34
22 12 34
24 10 34
26 8 34

This difference is down to the tone of the writing.  From what I saw today a 2:1 ratio of average sentence length to the percentage of complex words seems to give a good natural tone.  Too far in either direction and the tone either becomes too simplistic or too ‘wordy’.

So what use is all of this then?  Well being able to measure the readability and  tone of things you write should help target the piece to your intended audience.  If yon know who will be reading your doc, and even the individual sections within it, you can work the writing to best get your message across.

Whilst I’m sure all this is all pretty basic stuff and based on my own interpretation and assumptions, I thought it was a fascinating subject.  I wish I’d thought about it before today to be honest!  All in all it was an interesting day.