<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Filtering Group Policy to Windows 7 Computers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://refraction.co.uk/blog/2009/09/11/wmfiltering-group-policy-to-windows-7-computers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://refraction.co.uk/blog/2009/09/11/wmfiltering-group-policy-to-windows-7-computers/</link>
	<description>The long road to riches and ruin...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:33:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cjwdev</title>
		<link>http://refraction.co.uk/blog/2009/09/11/wmfiltering-group-policy-to-windows-7-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-40025</link>
		<dc:creator>Cjwdev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://refraction.co.uk/blog/?p=506#comment-40025</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this, we are just starting to roll out Windows 7 and it was a pain adding each Windows 7 user to an AD group just so that the Windows 7 GPOs would only apply to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this, we are just starting to roll out Windows 7 and it was a pain adding each Windows 7 user to an AD group just so that the Windows 7 GPOs would only apply to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: an3k</title>
		<link>http://refraction.co.uk/blog/2009/09/11/wmfiltering-group-policy-to-windows-7-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-13423</link>
		<dc:creator>an3k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 09:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://refraction.co.uk/blog/?p=506#comment-13423</guid>
		<description>Windows XP is &quot;5.1%&quot;, Windows Server 2003 is &quot;5.2%&quot; !

see http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc754488(WS.10).aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows XP is "5.1%", Windows Server 2003 is "5.2%" !</p>
<p>see <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc754488(WS.10).aspx" rel="nofollow">http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc754488(WS.10).aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moo-Crumpus</title>
		<link>http://refraction.co.uk/blog/2009/09/11/wmfiltering-group-policy-to-windows-7-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-11726</link>
		<dc:creator>Moo-Crumpus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://refraction.co.uk/blog/?p=506#comment-11726</guid>
		<description>select * is much more &#039;expensive&#039; then select version, producttype. you should prefer

SELECT Version, ProductType.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>select * is much more 'expensive' then select version, producttype. you should prefer</p>
<p>SELECT Version, ProductType.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aakash Shah</title>
		<link>http://refraction.co.uk/blog/2009/09/11/wmfiltering-group-policy-to-windows-7-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-10561</link>
		<dc:creator>Aakash Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://refraction.co.uk/blog/?p=506#comment-10561</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious, is it more efficient to say:

SELECT Version, ProductType from Win32_OperatingSystem Where Version like “6.1%” and ProductType = “1”

instead of 

SELECT * from Win32_OperatingSystem Where Version like “6.1%” and ProductType = “1”

Or, are they both pretty much the same in terms of delay?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm curious, is it more efficient to say:</p>
<p>SELECT Version, ProductType from Win32_OperatingSystem Where Version like “6.1%” and ProductType = “1”</p>
<p>instead of </p>
<p>SELECT * from Win32_OperatingSystem Where Version like “6.1%” and ProductType = “1”</p>
<p>Or, are they both pretty much the same in terms of delay?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaoren</title>
		<link>http://refraction.co.uk/blog/2009/09/11/wmfiltering-group-policy-to-windows-7-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-9834</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaoren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://refraction.co.uk/blog/?p=506#comment-9834</guid>
		<description>Hi excellent post there. keep it up.I frankly like to read your blog.Last of all have good day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi excellent post there. keep it up.I frankly like to read your blog.Last of all have good day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Basham</title>
		<link>http://refraction.co.uk/blog/2009/09/11/wmfiltering-group-policy-to-windows-7-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-8280</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Basham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://refraction.co.uk/blog/?p=506#comment-8280</guid>
		<description>Hi Ben,
That would certainly work, though all your user configuration would then be applied via the computer objects, to some extent you&#039;d lose the benefits of being able to use and filter user based policy.  Using the WMI filters you can still have different XP and 7 policies but have the user accounts in the same OU.  

T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ben,<br />
That would certainly work, though all your user configuration would then be applied via the computer objects, to some extent you'd lose the benefits of being able to use and filter user based policy.  Using the WMI filters you can still have different XP and 7 policies but have the user accounts in the same OU.  </p>
<p>T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://refraction.co.uk/blog/2009/09/11/wmfiltering-group-policy-to-windows-7-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-8099</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://refraction.co.uk/blog/?p=506#comment-8099</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to let you know I read your post and that I appreciate the time you took to write it up.  An idea I was thinking about to accomplish the same thing was using loopback policy processing and linking the user policies to an OU I&#039;ve got setup for my Win7 machines. Just wondering what you thought and if you&#039;d already tried this in your travels?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to let you know I read your post and that I appreciate the time you took to write it up.  An idea I was thinking about to accomplish the same thing was using loopback policy processing and linking the user policies to an OU I've got setup for my Win7 machines. Just wondering what you thought and if you'd already tried this in your travels?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

